What does seriousness in fitness to practise (FtP) mean for dental professionals?

One of the first things that struck me when joining the GDC as a Clinical Fellow was the realisation that all functions and activities undertaken by the GDC are governed by its legislative framework. Each healthcare regulator operates under its own legislation, bringing differences to FtP procedures and outcomes across regulators. The risks to patients posed by each profession and public views and expectations of different professions also varies.  

The research showed that there are some fundamental differences between regulators in how and when seriousness is considered during an FtP process, partly due to the differing legislative frameworks each operate in. However, there is some similarity and consistency in how seriousness is generally understood and used, especially for cases involving dishonesty, sexual misconduct, violence and some criminal convictions. 

Although the GDC is continuing to make improvements to the FtP process, current legislation is outdated and restrictive, limiting the ability to make significant changes. However, the findings from this research will inform work to develop a more consistent and proportional FtP system when regulatory reform makes this possible. This will ensure that patients continue to have recourse when something goes wrong, and regulation continues to build public confidence in the dental profession.